Support Them!

 

Twitter Feed
Swamp RSS Feeds
Categories
Search the Swamp
« EOD Links - 20100506 | Main | If it's convenient, it must be right, continued »
Thursday
May062010

NAC cuts Wild Rice funding

Want proof that Singapore is not going to be an international arts hub anytime soon?

THE National Arts Council (NAC) has cut the annual grant given to local theatre company Wild Rice. It will get $170,000 this year, down from $190,000 the year before.

It is the lowest annual grant that the company has received from the council. Artistic director Ivan Heng says the council told him funding was cut because its productions promoted alternative lifestyles, were critical of government policies and satirised political leaders.

A society that refuses to be critical of itself will never have a thriving arts scene. If the government is so confident that it is right all the time, then they shouldn't be afraid to have their policies and ministers criticised, scrutinised, and satirised.

This says a lot about the PAP government; it is far more important to be seen and perceived as good than to actually be that way. It's obvious which one is the harder, and right, thing to do.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Source
    THE National Arts Council (NAC) has cut the annual grant given to local theatre company Wild Rice. It will get $170,000 this year, down from $190,000 the year before.

Reader Comments (6)

This is sad really. PAP has no sense of humour. None of it whatsoever.

May 6, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterShawn Lim

I wanted to reply that they could perhaps stage it independently - until I realised that they needed a permit & licenses for a lot of stuf; which a government grand/fund eases.

I'm at lost to understand this attitude. :(

May 7, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMohd Hisham

Actually a govt grant / funding does not (contrary to popular perception) make it easier to get licences or permits.

This is because the funding and the permits are usually handled by separate government organisations with different objectives.

This is not necessarily a bad thing -- imagine if MHA handled arts funding for example :p

But it does mean that officers handling funding are sometimes caught in the middle between certain fundees and pressure from other govt organisations.

May 7, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterReadymade

@Readymade: That is true; different ministries and agencies in the mix can make it worse. I was not too peeved about the funding cut (though it is significant), but more about the reasons they gave for the cut.

May 7, 2010 | Registered CommenterCallan Tham

big brother is watching this!

May 13, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterwhats arts up dr

I think Mah Bow Tan's spiked hair is more stylo than Goh Chok Tong's.

May 15, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterPAP fan

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>